Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

 
Advanced search

126354 Posts in 4333 Topics- by 2825 Members - Latest Member: Wigmore

May 24, 2012, 02:57:49 PM
Philippine Tennis OnlineTennis EquipmentRacquets and StringsMicrogel vs. Youtek
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: Microgel vs. Youtek  (Read 320 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
rygo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« on: July 12, 2011, 08:02:07 PM »

Does anyone know what's the difference between Head Radical Microgel and Youtek version?
Logged
daryl
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 547


« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2011, 08:37:55 PM »

material used
Logged

laro lang Smiley
rafaEli
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 377


« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2011, 10:11:10 PM »

pagkakadinig ko ung Microgel may halong silica material at may trampauline effect daw, di ko lang alam sa Youtek...
Logged
rygo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2011, 11:21:02 PM »

ah ok.. the way i see it same concept lang naman cla both. but i dunno if what's the improvement sa youtek. does any of you naka try mag gamit nga radical, then youtek?
Logged
miguel090893
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 268


ACE!


« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2011, 11:44:43 PM »

kung sa radical, mas gusto ko ang microgel radical ipalo. parang mas solid frame nya ehh. mas spin friendly and may power, yung youtek radical parang mapaypay ung head nya and hindi spin friendly
Logged

"Let The Ball On Play"
renald
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 780


« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2011, 01:56:56 AM »

kung sa radical, mas gusto ko ang microgel radical ipalo. parang mas solid frame nya ehh. mas spin friendly and may power, yung youtek radical parang mapaypay ung head nya and hindi spin friendly
According to Head, Youtek uses D3O material that is soft that stiffens when you swing hard.
Logged
miguel090893
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 268


ACE!


« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2011, 01:56:01 PM »

kung sa radical, mas gusto ko ang microgel radical ipalo. parang mas solid frame nya ehh. mas spin friendly and may power, yung youtek radical parang mapaypay ung head nya and hindi spin friendly
According to Head, Youtek uses D3O material that is soft that stiffens when you swing hard.

oo nga po ehh.. pero di ko nafeefeel na ngiging stiff sya kapag malakas na ang palo. siguro hindi lang bagay sakin raketa na yan. kasi stiff rackets tlaga gamit ko dati pa ehh
Logged

"Let The Ball On Play"
racketwiz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


certified tennis bum


« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2011, 04:45:14 PM »

Does anyone know what's the difference between Head Radical Microgel and Youtek version?


Hype, that’s what it is.

The predominant material used in rackets is still graphite fibers and the matrix that binds them together.  Every year or so, manufacturers come up with some new tech to sell rackets.  If the material is so good, why change it like yesterday's underwear?  How much more feel, power or control does one really need from a racket? The reality is that specs must be maintained to preserve the performance characteristics of a racket line, regardless of what technojunk they mix into the frame.

Personally, I don’t get carried away with microgels, youteks, basalt n-coded x-factor liquidmetals.  Beyond the hype, the static and dynamic racket specs pretty much tell the real story.
Logged

GENIUS by birth, GRUMPY by choice
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Theme orange-lt created by panic