Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

 
Advanced search

126340 Posts in 4333 Topics- by 2913 Members - Latest Member: Wigmore

May 24, 2012, 10:25:26 AM
Philippine Tennis OnlineTennis EquipmentRacquets and Strings30 lbs and below Tensions? worth a try
Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: 30 lbs and below Tensions? worth a try  (Read 392 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
kimgenss23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 291


Impossible is nothing.....


« on: November 17, 2010, 06:09:34 PM »



I've read a blog about trying to hit with a very LOW string tension. I usually use polyester string @ 57 lbs or 55 lbs lowest. If you think 30 lbs is crazy, then why not give it a try. =)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

How low can you go?

No matter where I looked, what I read or whom I spoke to, I kept hearing talk about very low string tensions.

I guess it all started when I interviewed professional stringer and all out racquet guru, Priority One’s Nate Ferguson, in 2007. During the interview, pro player Filippo Volandri came into the stringing room to collect his racquet. It had been strung at 26lbs. That’s right, 26lbs, not kilos, you read it right, 26lbs. I was stunned.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Recently I started noticing more and more pros are dropping their chosen tension. Reading some threads in the string forum of our message board, Talk Tennis, I noticed some guys where hitting with very low tensions and were impressed by the results.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Enough already, I thought. I just had to try this low tension stuff out for myself. Now, I don’t string my racquets that tight anyway. My regular set up for my Volkl Powerbridge 10 Mid is a co-poly string at 52lbs.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Yesterday I initiated the test. I strung one of my racquets at 52lbs and another at 30lbs. My string of choice was Volkl Cyclone 16. Cyclone is a co-poly string, one of my favorites and a string I’m very familiar with so it seemed like a good base from which to test from. <!--[endif]-->

On court I started with my regular set up, the racquet at 52lbs. Everything felt great and I was hitting the ball well. After about 15 minutes I was fully warmed up and switched to the 30lbs racquet. Amazingly, my shots were staying in and the strings actually felt lower powered. The ball felt like it was flying on me more with the 52lbs racquet than the 30lbs racquet — that was a huge shock to me.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Most interestingly, I was getting a lot of spin with the 30lbs racquet. Switching back and forth between the two racquets, my hitting partner could see and feel an immediate difference on the spin of my shots between the two racquets. I was getting excellent hop on my topspin, but best of all was the slice. With the 30lbs racquet I could hit some wicked slice. I was really able to knife the ball and get it to skid fast and low. Two or three of my slice backhand approach shots actually went for clean winners and my hitting partner for the day has good speed about the court so I was very impressed. Another fact that surprised me was I did not have to adjust the strings at all. As usual for me with a poly, the strings returned to an aligned state after every shot. <!--[endif]-->

Okay, so today was day two of the test. I spoke to our TW Professor and he persuaded me to drop the tension lower. He said, “go to 20lbs,” I replied that 20lbs is crazy, but what the heck.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Today I warmed up with the 30lbs racquet because I had so much fun with it yesterday, 30lbs might be the new 52 for me. Then I switched to the 20lbs racquet. Right after switching, my hitting partner wanted to play some tiebreaks. Okay, this was going to be interesting. Trying to compete with a tennis racquet strung at a badminton tension.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Off the ground, things weren’t too different from 30lbs. The stringbed felt really, really soft. I was getting very good hop on topspin shots but felt my slice was floating a little. As I had found with the 30lbs tension, hitting volleys was effortless. I could volley with depth just by holding the racquet out, yet had all the feel I could ever want to help me find a short angle or hit a drop volley.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

The one shot I had trouble with was serving. With the 30lbs racquet I was getting lots of pace on flat serves and good action on spin serves. I was also serving with good accuracy. At 20lbs, it felt like the angle of the ball leaving the strings had altered and I was struggling to get my first serve out of the net. Whereas on groundstrokes I was finding more topspin and my shots were loopier, on flat serves it was the opposite — the ball was angling down quickly and I was finding the net. It didn’t matter too much I was able to still get a lot of kick and spin on second serves and start the point off offensively. I definitely felt a little alienated on serve. I was forced to make some alterations to my aiming at 20lbs that I didn’t need to make at 30lbs.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

With day two in the bag I’m preferring 30lbs. I’m not giving up on 20lbs yet, I just feel I need more time to get used to it. Hitting that tension in a more relaxed environment might also help, as the tiebreakers today were fiercely competitive — just as they should be.

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]-->

Where to go from here? Well, the TW Professor thinks I should go to 10lbs. That’s crazy right? But what the heck, for Friday it will be 10lbs. How low can I go?

Logged
smiley
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1286


« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2010, 06:52:51 PM »

nice article! prang lembo rock!  Grin

possibly, i'll try 50lbs next. hope, di magka tennis elbow...
Logged
reboj
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1681



WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2010, 07:20:12 PM »

Na try ko na eto upon reading this article before. I think this article was posted in TW Blog March 2010. I went down to 48 lbs full poly set up, hahahhha parang trampoline yung feeling ko sa string. kinabukasan binalik ko sa dati ung tension 58lbs. sayang string.hehhehhe, hinde ko na uulitin yun.  laugh laugh laugh
« Last Edit: November 18, 2010, 12:01:15 AM by reboj » Logged

LitoGarcia
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1841



« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2010, 11:45:22 PM »

Lower tension means more power. Higher tension means more control.
Logged

pedrolabasulo
Global Moderator
Superhero Member
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 1400



« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2010, 03:54:54 AM »

compromise
Logged

racketwiz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


certified tennis bum


« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2010, 09:04:20 AM »

Well, poly is a stiff string. Not a lot of elasticity. Lowering tension is just a way of softening up the poly stringbed to add more "give". Same reason why manufacturers often recommend a tension reduction of 5%-20% from usual, depending upon the type of poly your stick is being strung with.

Drastic tension reduction lowers impact shock and changes feel. This also increases the dwell time by a tiny fraction which could explain the extra action on the ball.

But again, a lot of times it boils down to player perception and either the conscious or unconscious things that he does to get the desired or perceived effect. There's a lot of room for "placebo effect".

For example, we've been hearing pro players say that poly strings give them a lot of power or spin. Us regular players hear that and we think there's something magical about these strings. Fact is, poly strings are so stiff that it actually tones down power. But, this inherent stiffness allows players to swing harder than usual while keeping the ball inbounds. Of course, if you swing harder, you get more pace and spin.

However, there is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to lowering tension on any type of string. Somewhere along the line, the low-tension stringbed loses the ability for energy return. Whack a ball into the net and ball hardly bounces back, doesn't it? Same idea on a stringbed that's too loose.
Logged

GENIUS by birth, GRUMPY by choice
edreams11
Mythical Member
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4041



« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2010, 09:30:31 AM »

Well, poly is a stiff string. Not a lot of elasticity. Lowering tension is just a way of softening up the poly stringbed to add more "give". Same reason why manufacturers often recommend a tension reduction of 5%-20% from usual, depending upon the type of poly your stick is being strung with.

Drastic tension reduction lowers impact shock and changes feel. This also increases the dwell time by a tiny fraction which could explain the extra action on the ball.

But again, a lot of times it boils down to player perception and either the conscious or unconscious things that he does to get the desired or perceived effect. There's a lot of room for "placebo effect".

For example, we've been hearing pro players say that poly strings give them a lot of power or spin. Us regular players hear that and we think there's something magical about these strings. Fact is, poly strings are so stiff that it actually tones down power. But, this inherent stiffness allows players to swing harder than usual while keeping the ball inbounds. Of course, if you swing harder, you get more pace and spin.

However, there is a point of diminishing returns when it comes to lowering tension on any type of string. Somewhere along the line, the low-tension stringbed loses the ability for energy return. Whack a ball into the net and ball hardly bounces back, doesn't it? Same idea on a stringbed that's too loose.

racketwiz, does it mean that the "trampoline effect" for loose strings does not apply to polys? sorry ha di ko masyadong nagets e hehe
Logged

i threw him a sink but he returned with a bathtub!!!
racketwiz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 851


certified tennis bum


« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2010, 03:51:53 PM »

Generally, a loose stringbed will deflect more than a tight stringbed, regardless of string type.  So, loose poly will deflect more than tight poly.  Compared to loose nylon, however, loose poly will deflect less because it is inherently stiffer.



Tensions below recommended tension range may not yield overall optimum performance.
Logged

GENIUS by birth, GRUMPY by choice
edreams11
Mythical Member
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 4041



« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2010, 04:38:15 PM »

Generally, a loose stringbed will deflect more than a tight stringbed, regardless of string type.  So, loose poly will deflect more than tight poly.  Compared to loose nylon, however, loose poly will deflect less because it is inherently stiffer.

Tensions below recommended tension range may not yield overall optimum performance.


thanks rw! kaya pala poly is the choice of many pros.. "now i know!" haha
Logged

i threw him a sink but he returned with a bathtub!!!
LitoGarcia
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1841



« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2010, 12:10:43 AM »

I remember one time when my string was done below tension recommended for my racket, I couldn't play the pace I'm used to. So i have it re-strung and wasted 450 pesos Grin
Logged

Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  

Theme orange-lt created by panic